There are several means to accomplish measurement & verification (M&V) for energy savings projects. One of the most straightforward methods is to use your organization’s utility bills.
The logic goes something like this: You have an inefficiency in your energy system. That system is located in a building served by a utility meter for which you receive a utility bill (could be a submeter, but the same logic would apply). You have the utility bill history, so you execute an energy saving project to improve energy efficiency. When done, you compare the post-project utility bills for the same building/meter with the historical bills. Ideally, the energy use (and associated cost) should decline, providing a metric to assess the success of the project.
But what if the weather was colder this winter, so you ended up using more energy to heat the building in spite of the project? Or what if you had to accommodate a dozen new employees in the same space? So the real challenge is to account for unrelated variables that can skew your data and prevent you from getting an accurate picture of project effectiveness.
Fortunately there is a guideline to help sort out savings. It’s called the International Performance Measurement and Verification Protocol (IPMVP). The standard is managed and maintained online by an international non-profit called The Efficiency Valuation Organization (www.EVO-World.org). IPMVP provides four different M&V options, but the one we are interested in is Option C, the “Whole Facility” methodology.
The IPMVP Option C methodology is simple:
IPMVP also provides assistance in identifying variables used to determine the adjusted baseline—variables like weather (expressed in terms of degree days), energy unit price, building square footage, changes in billing period length, enrollment or occupancy, new equipment, or even production units (for industrial facilities).
If you’d like to find out more about M&V, check out our recorded webinar, The ABCs of M&V, {{cta(‘e0abeb56-77e8-4259-9164-15acb12754bd’)}}